Thursday, June 13, 2013

PUTS revisited

Those who got the previous post on PUTS, now taken down, please ignore it and don't waste your time.
I took it down for 2 reasons: a wrong table was uploaded and resulted in all kinds of wrong things.  Secondly, I picked a very complicated example (behaving more like a straddle for the experts) that was
not a good choice for the first example.  We will anyway revisit PUTS etc more thoroughly at a later time.
Thanks to the subscriber who got back with some questions, otherwise I would not have noticed it myself.
Remeber my Warning: Don't trust anyone else; do your homework always.

No comments:

Post a Comment